List of Articles  

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Third Party Objectionable Judgments
  Ebadollah  Rostami Chalkasari Mahmud  Kohani
  Principally the issued judgments from trial authorities at principal of relativity must effect merely in relation of the parties of trial and cannot invoke at others than them, but sometimes those judgments defect the third parties of their rights. The legislator for pr More

  Principally the issued judgments from trial authorities at principal of relativity must effect merely in relation of the parties of trial and cannot invoke at others than them, but sometimes those judgments defect the third parties of their rights. The legislator for preservation from rights of them has permitted until they object to those judgments as third parties which it is named as "third party objection". There is no unanimity of opinions in the matter of what judgments have the third party objection receptivity? Absoluteness of the legislator's expression includes all of judgments either decree or order issued by court and includes conclusive judgments and on the other hand the proviso the "court" as the issued judgments issuer author, doesn’t include other authors. The right of objection has been recognized to arbitration award and judgments issued by administrative Justice Court, but about other authors haven't been done sufficient and necessary review, thus in this paper we will determine the judgments which the third party can object to them. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Interpretation Of Article 540 Of The Civil Code Emphasizing The Principle Of Good Faith (A Comparative Study In The Laws Of Islamic Countries, Imami jurisprudence and Iranian law)
  Farshid Khosravi Mohammad  Kohani
  The agricultural contract is one of the continuous and temporary contracts, therefore, for its validity, it is necessary to determine its duration, sometimes, despite the determination of the duration, as a result of the occurrence of force majeure, the crop may not rea More

  The agricultural contract is one of the continuous and temporary contracts, therefore, for its validity, it is necessary to determine its duration, sometimes, despite the determination of the duration, as a result of the occurrence of force majeure, the crop may not reach and be harvested within the specified period, regarding this legislative situation. Article 540 of the Civil Code states: "If the farm contract expires and the crop has not yet been planted, the farmer has the right to remove the crop or to maintain it by charging a reasonable fee." Regarding the ruling of this article, there are many differences of opinion among jurists and jurists. In the present research, an attempt has been made to provide an interpretation based on the principle of good faith while reviewing and criticizing the ideas presented in this case. Also, the legal solution of other countries such as Egypt and Qatar has been briefly examined. Manuscript profile