List of Articles عقد

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Investigating The Relationship Between Lease And To Put Decision In Iranian Law
  Mehdi  Hamzeh Hoveida Kourosh  Bayat
  There has been a lot of research on rent and forgery, but little research has been done on the relationship between rent and forgery, so research in this case is necessary. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between rent and forgery More

  There has been a lot of research on rent and forgery, but little research has been done on the relationship between rent and forgery, so research in this case is necessary. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between rent and forgery with respect to According to jurists, these results have been achieved through the library collection method. Lease is considered as a contract, while there are disagreements about the to put of the contract, which according to the definition of the contract in the civil law, forgery is also considered as a contract and the to put and agent are committed to do a series of things. The important difference between a lease contract and a to put contract is that a lease contract is necessary, but a forgery contract is permissible, and also in some rulings such as determining the agent and the action and the duration and exchange of the conditions of validity are different. Although the lease contract is different from the to put contract, but they are similar in other respects as well, such as being a covenant, being in exchange, being a trustee, and so on. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Examining the nature and comparing the lease with the condition of ownership to the suspended contract in Iranian law.
  Donya Hosseini moghadam
  10.61186/ahrar.45964.4.8.1
  The purpose of this study is to examine and compare the nature of "rent with the condition of ownership" with suspended contracts in Iranian law. Although the "rent with the condition of ownership" contract originated and developed in the Western legal system, due to it More

  The purpose of this study is to examine and compare the nature of "rent with the condition of ownership" with suspended contracts in Iranian law. Although the "rent with the condition of ownership" contract originated and developed in the Western legal system, due to its advantages over similar legal institutions such as installment sales, suspended sales, and rental contracts, it can also be a suitable substitute for these legal institutions in our country's legal system. At first glance, it may seem that this contract is a rental agreement in which a condition for the tenant to become the owner is included at the end of the contract. However, it should be noted that "rent with the condition of ownership" has many similarities with contracts such as installment sales with a void condition, suspended sales, rental contracts, and mortgages. Despite these similarities, there are also significant differences with these contracts. Therefore, this contract cannot be included in the framework of any of these contracts, and it must be accepted that "rent with the condition of ownership" is an independent contract. Insisting on including this contract in the framework of other contracts creates problems that harm both parties and do not correspond to their wishes.   One of these differences is the difference in the characteristics and nature of suspended contracts. A suspended contract is a contract whose occurrence and realization are subject to the occurrence of another event. In fact, a suspended contract is a contract that does not have any legal effect after (offer and acceptance), meaning that an agreement is reached and a contract is concluded, but its effect is not created and is subject to an incident. The widespread use of these types of contracts in recent years has made it necessary to identify their nature and provisions. Manuscript profile