List of Articles حکم

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Third Party Objectionable Judgments
  Ebadollah  Rostami Chalkasari Mahmud  Kohani
  Principally the issued judgments from trial authorities at principal of relativity must effect merely in relation of the parties of trial and cannot invoke at others than them, but sometimes those judgments defect the third parties of their rights. The legislator for pr More

  Principally the issued judgments from trial authorities at principal of relativity must effect merely in relation of the parties of trial and cannot invoke at others than them, but sometimes those judgments defect the third parties of their rights. The legislator for preservation from rights of them has permitted until they object to those judgments as third parties which it is named as "third party objection". There is no unanimity of opinions in the matter of what judgments have the third party objection receptivity? Absoluteness of the legislator's expression includes all of judgments either decree or order issued by court and includes conclusive judgments and on the other hand the proviso the "court" as the issued judgments issuer author, doesn’t include other authors. The right of objection has been recognized to arbitration award and judgments issued by administrative Justice Court, but about other authors haven't been done sufficient and necessary review, thus in this paper we will determine the judgments which the third party can object to them. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - A Study Of Obligatory And Situational Rules In The Iranian Legal System
  Arman  Yaghobi Moghadam Ashkan  Naeimi
  Rules based on one division in the science of principles are divided into situational and obligatory rules.There is one difference between the fundamentalists in the nature of the obligatory rulings, but there is a difference of opinion in the nature of the rulings. Two More

  Rules based on one division in the science of principles are divided into situational and obligatory rules.There is one difference between the fundamentalists in the nature of the obligatory rulings, but there is a difference of opinion in the nature of the rulings. Two comments have been obtained between principles. Some fundamentalists, such as Sheikh Ansari, consider the status quo to be detached from the mandatory mandate. Others, such as Fazel Toni, consider the nature of the status quo to be independent. In this research that in terms of practice data collection is a library, we will prove that the separation of status sentences from mandatory sentences in the Iranian legal system has many benefits. Manuscript profile